Critical care clinicians can change physiology with a number of tools. They can repeatedly, often and mercilessly change physiological variables. They can increase the blood pressure (or decrease it); they can increase cardiac output (or decrease it), they can increase cardiac filling pressures (or decrease them), they can increase glucose levels (or decrease them), they can increase positive fluid balance (or decrease it) and so on. This kind of “numerology” is attractive because the outcomes are tautological and clinicians feel powerful and effective. However, outside the obvious situations where physiology is so dangerously abnormal as to threaten life, such physiological manipulations have an unproven relationship with outcome. Importantly, patients do not care whether their cardiac output has been increased from 5L/min to 6 L/min. They only care whether they live or die, get out of hospital intact and return to their previous life. Thus, physiological gain is not patient centred. Moreover, all research focusing of the physiology of a specific intervention always and inevitably deals with the effect on a specific set of variables. For example and fluid bolus may or may not increase cardiac output for a while. Thus studies focus on identifying fluid responders for such purposes. However, no one studies the effect of such fluid bolus on anything other than hemodynamics. No one measures what the effect is on the immune system, cerebral edema, the glycocalyx, interstitial oxygen gradient, pulmonary congestion, body temperature, haemoglobin and white cell function etc. etc. Thus, all physiological studies are “blind” to the effects that their protagonists cannot or will not measure. In other words, the measurable is made important but the important may not be measured. Clinicians need to reflect on this before they become seduced by physiological manipulation.
The Problem with Physiology
Related Articles
-
Finding the Needle in the Haystack: Paediatric Cardiac Disease by Michele Domico
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, Paediatric Cardiac Disease, 0
There are several pediatric cardiac disease processes that get misdiagnosed because they present with other symptoms. No child comes...
-
The Global Refugee Crisis: Why it’s Critical that we Care by Vera Sistenich
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, critical care, Global Refugee Crisis, 0
Why it’s critical that we care? The global refugee crisis exemplifies some of the greatest challenges facing our global...
-
The Clinician Advocate: How Evidence and Anecdote Produce Change
Phoebe Adams, , 2017, The Talks DASsmacc, Advocate, Alcohol, clinician, Emergency Departments, public health, 0
Emergency departments are at the forefront of dealing with the harmful effects of alcohol consumption. ED alcohol-related presentation data...
-
-
-
Peter Brindley interrogates: Scott Weingart
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, medical interrogations, 0
From Upstairs Care Downstairs to Kettlebells for the Brain… WTF? A no-holds barred series of 6 provocative medical interrogations....
-
SMACCForce: Bringing Lessons from MERT back home
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, MERT, smaccFORCE, 0
Bringing Lessons from MERT back home by Claire Park
-
Diagnosing Meningitis – CSF lactate, procalcitonin and fungitell, when to pull the trigger on steroids/abx?
Phoebe Adams, , 2017, The Talks DASsmacc, antibiotics, bacteria, brain, CSF, CT, emergency department, fungitell, lactate, LP, Meningitis, Neuro EM, procalcitonin, steroids, 0
The golden hour of meningitis involves rapid identification, workup, and treatment. In most cases, the diagnosis of meningitis is...
0 Comments